Post Releases on Hubsoftware
Forum rules
- Make sure that the changelog is included
- Make sure you don't double post
- Make sure to have the download and homepage link included
-
Pietry
- Senior Member
- Posts: 328
- Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2007 7:25 am
- Location: Bucharest
Post
by Pietry » Tue Feb 12, 2008 8:51 pm
Some bug fixes mostly, also, the Bloom Filter Extension implementation is now complete, although not enabled by default. You need to edit your xml config file in order to enable ( if you please ).
Link:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/adchpp
Changes:
- * access.lua: fixed message type for MSG
* Some minor socket fixes
* Initial Bloom filter implementation
* Fixed 100% cpu / infinite resend bug
Just someone
-
darkKlor
Post
by darkKlor » Mon Dec 01, 2008 6:33 am
Is this project dead? It's not ADC/1.0 compliant because it reports the hub as CT5 in the INF stage, instead of CT32, which from what I can tell was last in the ADC/0.14 spec (though I can't find any later revisions before 1.0). If hub software can't even be ADC/1.0 compliant in the near-login stage then it's just dead weight and doing the community a disservice.
-
Pietry
- Senior Member
- Posts: 328
- Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2007 7:25 am
- Location: Bucharest
Post
by Pietry » Fri Jan 02, 2009 5:42 pm
It's probably a bug, this doesn't mean it's not ADC 1.0 compliant. The project it's not dead. The main goal of the project is to provide a reference implementation not a hubsoft that people actually could use. The main purpose of the project is to try out the latest ADC extension and ideas.
Just someone
-
yapi
- Newbie
- Posts: 8
- Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2009 3:24 pm
Post
by yapi » Wed Feb 25, 2009 3:36 pm
SF links are wrong so u may want to investigate that... there is dot in front of link so ppl cannot download files... something like http://.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/adchpp/ADCH++.2.2.-noarch-src.zip for example...
-
Pietry
- Senior Member
- Posts: 328
- Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2007 7:25 am
- Location: Bucharest
Post
by Pietry » Wed Feb 25, 2009 6:49 pm
SF links are wrong so u may want to investigate that
What links do you mean ?
Just someone
-
Pietry
- Senior Member
- Posts: 328
- Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2007 7:25 am
- Location: Bucharest
Post
by Pietry » Thu Feb 26, 2009 5:46 pm
I ment where did yapi see the bad links.

Just someone
Users browsing this forum: Google (Crawler) and 0 guests