About Favorites - 2 new feats.

[Lemuria]

"Add connected to favorites"

and a harder one:

multiple favorites lists:

Add a menu to DC++ called Favorites, which contains groups of favorite lists, which allows one to categorize hubs (e.g. there´s a problem if your share contains stuff that specific hubs do not allow, this way one could sort favorites into groups from the hub rules).

/M

[sarf]

"Add connected to favorites"

Already implemented (though requires you to use a slash-command). Simply type in "/fav" in the chat-editbox in the hub-window (i.e. where you usually type in the text you wish to present to other people in the hub).

As to the other... groups of favorites is possible to do, but would require restructuring the way favorites are handled. This requires recoding the favorite hub handling quite a bit. Not very likely to happen as it is an "eye-candy" fix mostly, and since arnetheduck seems to favor "technical" issues.

Sarf
---
Colorless green ideas sleep furiously.

[Lemuria]

"Add connected hubs to favorites"

A way to add all hubs you´re connected to in the session... if you´re connected to 20-30 hubs it gets kinda trivial to write that in all of them..

Or,

Instead a "Save session" function ..

See what i mean?

/M

[slurm]

Sorry Lemuria, but I think tahat having 20-30 opened hubs at once is an abuse of dc++ so any features which will support this type of using shouldn't be implemented.

[GargoyleMT]

The favorites and "auto-connect" implement most of the functionality of a "save session" feature, which definitely has merit, even with just two hubs.

If you're able to run 20-30 hubs at a time, well... It does seem that if you're able to juggle the shares and give good speeds to your uploaders, then you go girl.

A favorites menu, akin to web browsers, might be useful, it's certainly quite a lot of user interface fluff. It's also a bit of work, at least for the front end. (and once it's created, people might want to then be able to bring up a context menu on the menu items, drag them around, etcetera like you can do in IE, which would be not fun to duplicate code wise.)