bandwitch limiter don't detected !!

ibicoben · Post by **ibicoben** » 2006-02-28 20:41

Ih!

i'm OP on a french hub, and since few time there's a new bandwitch limiter is arrived, is name " DU supercontroler" available on this link for test ==> http://www.01net.com/telecharger/windows/Internet/connection/fiches/27113.html

When user use Du supercontroler whith DC++, not any client or OP client can detecte it, best OP client too.

I think the problem is, dc++ don't support or detect DU supercontroler

on the order hand, when DU supercontroler is used whit the french client Zion++, all of client dected his used

Could you tell me from where come this probleme, and, if it's possible to repared it?

thanks you for your answer

Todi · Post by **Todi** » 2006-02-28 21:03

Er... you can't detect Netlimiter when it's used with DC++ either. What's different here? If you're advocating that DC++ should put "BANDWIDTH LIMITER" in the tag or something.. good luck.

Bandwith limiters are useful, and necessary for many users. What's the problem?

ibicoben · Post by **ibicoben** » 2006-02-28 21:41

Er... you can't detect Netlimiter when it's used with DC++ either. What's different here? If you're advocating that DC++ should put "BANDWIDTH LIMITER" in the tag or something.. good luck.

I can detect user with bandwitch limiter , with my Z++ and other dc++ , it's indicate in the type connexion in the hub ( but only netlimiter and not DU Supercontroler)

Bandwith limiters are useful, and necessary for many users. What's the problem?

because there are many bad users who use not corectly ( exemple => limited 1ko )

ibicoben · Post by **ibicoben** » 2006-03-01 01:28

http://img492.imageshack.us/img492/4421 ... ter0rh.jpg

Xan1977 · Post by **Xan1977** » 2006-03-01 03:05

ibicoben wrote:I can detect user with bandwitch limiter

You're using a DC++ clone which reads the broadcasted information from another DC++ clone (CZDC derivative) which is coded to fetch and display the netlimiter setting. It didn't detect anything. Get the author to include an interface for DU Supercontroler and distribute it and you'll be good.

Todi · Post by **Todi** » 2006-03-01 07:35

Basically, when you thought you were detecting netlimiter, you were only looking at what one certain dc++ clone was telling you. Everyone in your hub could be using netlimiter, and you wouldn't have a clue, because you were staring blindly at that result. See how pointless that is?

ibicoben · Post by **ibicoben** » 2006-03-01 16:52

it's very strange , when I use dc++ 0.674 with netlimiter or Du Supercontroler , impossible to reperate this.

Whereas I use my client Z++ with bandwitch , it's indicate in the type of connexion.

DC++ can send the information from another DC++ for detect bandwitch limiters ???

Bandwith limiters are useful, and necessary for many users. What's the problem?

Why hide the use of limiter ??? :?:

Post by **GargoyleMT** » 2006-03-01 17:34

ibicoben wrote:DC++ can send the information from another DC++ for detect bandwitch limiters ???

It could, but it does not, and is not likely to.

ibicoben wrote:Why hide the use of limiter ???

DC++ doesn't care if you use one. DC++ doesn't detect if you have one. There's no reason it should - either netlimiter or "DU Supercowomgbbqlimiter".

You're confused about what features your client provides.

ibicoben · Post by **ibicoben** » 2006-03-01 18:19

DC++ doesn't care if you use one. DC++ doesn't detect if you have one

Why in the connection there are > Netlimiter[*] (see image in top)
hub send the connection type of user, if he has or not a bandwitch ?

Post by **GargoyleMT** » 2006-03-01 19:07

ibicoben wrote:Why in the connection there are > Netlimiter[*] (see image in top)

Because the client that the user is running detects NetLimiter and shows it in his tag to everyone but himself. (It displays a "normal" tag/connection type to him so he doesn't catch on.) It's a feature of his client, not of yours.

ibicoben · Post by **ibicoben** » 2006-03-01 20:25

hi,

Realy you think , DC++ normal doesn't running detect netlimiter ???

http://img401.imageshack.us/img401/6807 ... ter3po.jpg
I see 0.674 with netlimiter=>>>>> it's dc++ clone ???

I dont understand ,when I use 0.674 ( dc++ good) with a limiter , client don't running detects Netlimiter.
it's the hub (scripts )??? setting of my client ???

Because the client that the user is running detects NetLimiter and shows it in his tag to everyone but himself

DC++ doesn't ???

TheParanoidOne · Post by **TheParanoidOne** » 2006-03-01 21:44

ibicoben wrote:it's dc++ clone ???

Yes.

ibicoben · Post by **ibicoben** » 2006-03-01 22:49

ok , you think every client into my image are dc++ clone ??

strange !!!

It's possible to include in new version DC++ this option ( see if user use limiter ) ??

Post by **ullner** » 2006-03-01 23:06

ibicoben wrote:ok , you think every client into my image are dc++ clone ??

Yes.

ibicoben wrote:It's possible to include in new version DC++ this option ( see if user use limiter ) ??

Possible? Sure. Likely? No.

Post by **GargoyleMT** » 2006-03-02 16:47

ibicoben wrote:It's possible to include in new version DC++ this option ( see if user use limiter ) ??

Although you like the feature, it's not going to be added to DC++ itself. DC++ should not care about what other applications the user is running, and it should not spy on the user and report that information back to anyone else.

Users need to be able to trust that DC++ isn't doing anything underhanded to their system.

ibicoben · Post by **ibicoben** » 2006-03-02 21:48

GargoyleMT wrote:Users need to be able to trust that DC++ isn't doing anything underhanded to their system.

what ??? it's not underhanted :?:

it's a indication for operator !!!!!!!

if it's not possible to see realy connection type of user why there are this option ( connection type:DSL,Cable etc....)

When DSL users limit their "BANDWIDTH" (sorry for mistake in top lol ), they destort connection , no ???

thx , but my post is an aim of see realy connection type and not spy or kick users limiting :lol:

Post by **GargoyleMT** » 2006-03-02 22:59

ibicoben wrote:what ??? it's not underhanted
it's a indication for operator !!!!!!!

I'll let you figure out the irony.

ibicoben · Post by **ibicoben** » 2006-03-02 23:22

GargoyleMT wrote:I'll let you figure out the irony.

it's not irony =>>just a proposal for DC++ care other applications (limiter ) the user is running.

thx guy !!! :cry:

Post by **GargoyleMT** » 2006-03-02 23:35

Post, welcome to your new home: The Hall of Fame.

bandwitch limiter don't detected !!

bandwitch limiter don't detected !!

Who is online