sarf wrote:... but since when has logic been of any use to somewhen other than a scientist in physics/mathematics? Everyone else seems to be doing without (and having more fun) so I think I'll take a pass on that nasty logic stuff... I've heard it leads to "truth" and other such fairy-tale locations.
Hmmmm... You don't think logic applies anywhere outside of physics or mathematics....
How interesting. This explains much.
I doubt that Arne would appreciate anyone stating that his endeavours (or endeavors, to the US people...) are not the result of applied logic.
More spaghetti-code, sarf?
sarf wrote:... Thanks. Since I am a troll's troll, you are by definition a troll... while I applaud this latest revelation you've apparently had about yourself, don't you think that it is pretty... well... "untactical" to call yourself a troll on forums where trolls are not warmly welcome?
I did not call myself a troll. You are misdefining me as such. If I were a troll, I certainly would not choose you as my troll. Therefor, I cannot be a troll regardless of the fact that you are a "troll's troll."
sarf wrote:... I use it to prove my points. You see, it doesn't matter if parts of a post is true, just that some parts are false...
In other words, you don't care what people really say. All that matters to you is what you can select from what they say, out of context, so you can try to prove a point, regardless that said proof is based on false assumptions and inaccurate interpretation of partial data.
What should truly matter is the veracity of your positions, not the excuses for justifying them. But it appears that you really don't give a rip about that. All you seem to desire is to argue with someone about something.